Global MARCH Against Chemtrails and Geoengeneering
August 25th 2013
August 25th 2013
Chemtrails, now known by the more acceptable moniker of Solar Radiation Management [SRM], is being publicly hailed as the globe's geoengineering saviour by many, including some climate scientists and many economists. But is it, or is just another dangerous bit of greenwashing that James Hanson refers to as 'Doubling Down on Our Faustian Bargain'?
Speaking of the devil, the US Air Force report 'Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025' outlines the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives, stating, "In 2025, US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications."
Then perhaps, in the course of their normal world-domination research, the military bumped into ol' Beelzebub who's proffered a deal including a 'solution' to global warming but in exchange...well, in addition to the reality that as more and more greenhouse gases were emitted more and more of the antidote would be needed to counteract it, was the fact that the antidote needed in increasing desperation was made of barium and aluminum particles which were already known to be toxic human health.
Knowing that in due course the military would frantically have launch more and more Stratocruisers, each burning huge amounts of fuel themselves, all the while having to keep the stupid scheme a secret because of the toxins they'd be spreading, Mephistopheles laughed again at how easily the dim-witted humans would abandon their moral principles in order to obtain whatever immediate benefits they desired.
Not only SRM geoengineering schemes, but all of them, have huge energy footprints never mentioned in the glossy brochures promoting their bromides. Looking closely at the energy embedded in every geoengineering scheme is like watching channel 666, Comedy Central, on Satan's satellite system.
For instance, as Carbon Engineering's president David Keith says of CO2 air capture, often viewed as benign or 'soft' geoengineering [after all what could possibly be wrong with removing carbon dioxide from the overloaded atmosphere], "For starters, air capture of CO2 requires vast amounts of water and, yes, more energy. According to one study, scrubbing all current annual fossil fuel emissions from the air would deprive 53 million people of water." Going on to say, " Even capturing CO2 from power station smokestacks, where it is already in a relatively concentrated stream, requires those power plants to burn nearly one third more fuel in order to generate the same amount of energy, plus the additional demand required to power carbon capture. Capturing CO2 from the air, where it is measured in parts per million, would require vastly more power stations to be built in the first place. More carbon-spewing power stations that is, to help scrub a bit of the emitted CO2 back out of the air."
Of course over time whistleblowers have come forward to warn us about SRM [chemtrails] including airport managers, airline industry executives and the US Air force itself, but the military and security establishments have remained silent until... the situation became so desperate that even an idea as dysfunctional as geoengineering became acceptable as a greenwashing euphemism for climate remediation...until now.
So here we are, stuck in steerage on board the Global Titanic as the elites take a shot a making another few trillion from geoengineering. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, they make their deals and they secure access to the limited seats in the lifeboats on their south seas islands.