The mainstream media dismisses all challenges to the official government versions of the events still clearly etched in the minds of millions of us who watched them live in horror that morning. Yet the controversy doesn't die, if fact world wide opinion polls indicate a highly sceptical public attitude to the Washington account of 9/11. Last year's 9/11 opinion poll in the UK showed only 7% of respondents believe they have been told the whole story of the 9/11 attacks. Meanwhile most members of the Washington's 9/11 Commission have now distanced themselves from its findings.
Skeptics, including mr. mud, find much more fertile ground online where websites like 911Blogger and 911Truth carry well researched articles where a wide variety of technical experts – high-rise architects, structural engineers, controlled demolition technicians, chemists, physicists, and more - present scientific evidence that controlled demolition, not "normal office fires" as claimed by NIST, caused the destruction of the buildings.
PBS is the first major TV network to air the program '9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out'. It is being shown in full on Colorado Public Television as well as online. In this new film, over 40 experts in the fields of structural engineering, high-rise architecture, controlled demolition, physics, chemistry and metallurgy lay out the case for a controlled demolition of the World Trade Center on 9/11. The experts cite evidence showing that high-temperature incendiaries and explosives were planted throughout the twin towers and the lesser-known Building 7 which collapsed later the same day.
Another 15-minute long documentary [embedded below], this one narrated by Ed Asner, highlights the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 pm on 9/11. In it numerous structural engineers – the people who know the most about office building vulnerabilities and accidents – say that the official explanation of why building 7 at the World Trade Center collapsed on 9/11 is “impossible”. They show how Thermite caused the destruction of Building 7 on 9/11 and provide documented evidence that it was a controlled demolition that took months to setup..
All of these experts, highly respected and published in their fields, can't possibly be lying about what they've found, their careers are in jeoparady for speaking out. Why, other than believing their findings to be true, would they publish these statements? Many of the familes and friends of the 911 victims, as you'll see on the 911Blogger or 911Truth websites, don't accept the government's story and are outspoken in their demand for an independent scientific investigation. If the government has nothing to hide why wouldn't they too support one?
